A comprehensive comparison between MySQL and PostgreSQL

Review all blog information to know more about databases and our products.

A comprehensive comparison between MySQL and PostgreSQL

MySQL and PostgreSQL are both open-source relational database management systems with wide user bases and years of development history in the field of database management. While both are used for storing and managing data, they have significant differences in various aspects including performance, features, scalability, licensing, and community support. In this article, we will provide a comprehensive comparison of these two databases to help you choose the database management system that best fits your needs.

1. Basic Information Comparison

MySQL

  1. Developer: Maintained by Oracle Corporation.
  2. License: Uses GPL (General Public License).
  3. Supported OS: Windows, Linux, macOS, etc.
  4. Initial Use Case: Developed initially for web applications such as WordPress, Drupal, etc.
  5. Programming Languages: Supports multiple languages including Java, Python, PHP, etc.

PostgreSQL

  1. Developer: Maintained by the PostgreSQL Global Development Group.
  2. License: Uses MIT License, which allows more flexible usage.
  3. Supported OS: Windows, Linux, macOS, etc.
  4. Focus: Emphasizes ACID compliance and data integrity.
  5. Features: Known for strong extensibility and customization capabilities.

2. Data Types Comparison

MySQL

  1. Standard SQL Types: Provides standard SQL data types such as integers, floating points, date-time, etc.
  2. Non-standard Types: Supports ENUM, SET, etc.
  3. Array Types: Does not support array data types.
  4. JSON Support: Relatively new feature for JSON support.

PostgreSQL

  1. Extensive Data Types: Provides a wide range of data types including integers, floating points, date-time, arrays, JSON, JSONB, etc.
  2. Custom Types: Allows developers to create user-defined data types.
  3. Range Types: Includes range data types for handling date, time ranges, etc.
  4. Spatial Data: Supports geospatial data types and full-text search data types.

3. Scalability Comparison

MySQL

  1. Large Datasets: May encounter performance issues with large datasets.
  2. Partitioning: Uses table partitioning and vertical partitioning to enhance performance and scalability.
  3. Replication: Supports master-slave replication and clustering configuration.

PostgreSQL

  1. Large Datasets: Excellent scalability, capable of handling large datasets.
  2. Features: Supports table partitioning, parallel query processing, tablespaces, etc.
  3. Replication: Offers flexible replication and advanced streaming replication settings.

4. ACID Compliance Comparison

MySQL

  1. ACID: Complies with ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) principles.
  2. Default Isolation Level: Repeatable Read.

PostgreSQL

  1. ACID: Strong emphasis on ACID compliance and data integrity.
  2. Isolation Levels: Offers multiple isolation levels, including Repeatable Read and Serializable.
  3. Concurrency: Supports advanced concurrency control and transaction management.

5. Extensions and Plugins Comparison

MySQL

  1. Community and Plugins: Extensive community support and third-party plugins.
  2. Procedures and Triggers: Supports stored procedures and triggers.
  3. Storage Engines: Uses storage engines to achieve various functionalities.

PostgreSQL

  1. Custom Functions: Supports writing custom functions, triggers, stored procedures, etc.
  2. Plugin System: Powerful plugin system supporting numerous extensions.
  3. Custom Plugins: Allows developers to write custom plugins.

6. Community Support Comparison

MySQL

  1. Community Support: Large community support and extensive documentation.
  2. Resources: Multiple official and unofficial forums, blogs, etc.

PostgreSQL

  1. Community Engagement: Enthusiastic community emphasizing user participation.
  2. Resources: Rich official documentation and online resources.
  3. Updates: Regular updates and patches.

7. Security Comparison

MySQL

  1. Basic Security: Provides basic security features such as user privilege management and SSL support.
  2. Enhanced Security: Third-party tools and plugins available for enhanced security.

PostgreSQL

  1. Advanced Security: Offers advanced security features including row-level security and SSL support.
  2. Authentication: Supports various authentication methods and LDAP integration.

8. Replication and High Availability

MySQL

  1. Replication: Supports master-slave replication with automatic failover.
  2. High Availability: Multiple high availability solutions such as MySQL Group Replication.

PostgreSQL

  1. Streaming Replication: Supports streaming replication and can configure streaming replication clusters.
  2. Advanced Features: Features logical replication and BDR (Bi-Directional Replication).

9. Performance Characteristics Comparison

MySQL

  1. Read-Intensive Applications: Excels in read-intensive applications with query caching to improve read performance. However, query caching may not be suitable for high-concurrency environments due to lock contention.
  2. Partitioning: Supports both vertical and horizontal partitioning to improve performance and scalability by splitting tables into multiple partitions.
  3. Replication: Master-slave replication allows distributing read traffic to multiple slave nodes, enhancing performance and availability.
  4. Indexes: Simple indexing system; good performance with well-designed indexes but may suffer if indexes are misused.

PostgreSQL

  1. Complex Queries: Excels in handling complex queries with a mature query optimizer, making it ideal for analytical applications and data warehousing.
  2. Write-Intensive Applications: Performs well in write-intensive applications using Multi-Version Concurrency Control (MVCC) to allow multiple transactions to modify data simultaneously without lock contention, providing excellent performance in high-concurrency write scenarios.
  3. Parallel Query: Supports parallel queries, allowing multiple CPU cores to process queries simultaneously, enhancing query performance.
  4. Advanced Indexing: Advanced indexing mechanisms including B-trees, hashes, GIN (Generalized Inverted Index for full-text search), and GiST (Generalized Search Tree for geospatial data), providing good performance across different types of applications.

10. Performance Comparison

Database Versions:

  1. MySQL: 8.0
  2. PostgreSQL: 13.4

Hardware Configuration:

  1. Server Specs: Dual-core, 4GB RAM
  2. Storage: SSD

Load Conditions:

  1. Data Volume: 1,000,000 rows
  2. Queries: Includes read queries, write queries, and complex queries
    Read Query Performance:
  3. MySQL: Average query response time of 10 milliseconds in read-intensive scenarios.
  4. PostgreSQL: Average query response time of 8 milliseconds under the same load, slightly better than MySQL.

Write Query Performance:

  1. MySQL: Can handle 1000 write operations per second in write-intensive scenarios.
  2. PostgreSQL: Can handle 1200 write operations per second, performing slightly better.

Complex Query Performance:

  1. MySQL: Average response time of 50 milliseconds for complex queries involving multi-table joins and aggregations.
  2. PostgreSQL: Better average response time of 40 milliseconds under the same load.

Concurrency Performance:

  1. MySQL: Stable performance with an average response time increasing to 20 milliseconds with 100 concurrent users.
  2. PostgreSQL: Lower average response time of 15 milliseconds under the same load.

Conclusion:

  1. MySQL: Performs well in read-intensive applications but slightly lags behind PostgreSQL in complex queries and write-intensive applications.
  2. PostgreSQL: Excels in complex queries, write-intensive applications, and high-concurrency scenarios.

11. Summary

Both MySQL and PostgreSQL are powerful relational database management systems suited to different use cases and requirements. For handling large datasets, complex queries, and applications emphasizing data integrity, PostgreSQL is likely the better choice. On the other hand, for read-intensive applications or those requiring high-performance write operations, MySQL may be more suitable.

The final choice will depend on your specific needs, team expertise, and project nature. Thoroughly researching each database’s features and best practices is crucial to ensuring high performance and reliability.

Feedback

For inquiries or feedback, please contact the SQLynx team at service@sqlynx.com.

Share

Copyright © 2024 SQLynx Co., Ltd.